Poetry Appreciation Essay Essays

Poetry Appreciation Essay Essays Poetry Appreciation Essay Essay Poetry Appreciation Essay Essay In this essay I am traveling to compare and contrast ‘When we two parted’ a verse form of George Gordon. Lord Byron’s written in 1815 and Letitia Elizabeth Landon’s ‘Love’s last lesson’ written in c1838. both poets are British and of the romantic period. ‘When we two parted’ is an lament of the loss of love. Byron is reflecting and analysing a relationship that has already ended. His heartache. choler and desperation. intensifies his usage of first individual. which maintains a strong impact on the audience throughout. The verse form is powerful. personal and unreserved. the emotion and passion is decidedly felt through his authorship. Byron’s message is equivocal ; so the reader is able to do their ain premise this is the beauty of the verse form. it is capable to single reading. doing it inclusive and relatable to many different state of affairss. The construction of the verse form is separated into four stanzas each one being an eight. Punctuation suggests that every two lines can be read as one. the meter of the verse form is iambic pentameter. each line holding 5 iambs and 10 syllables when two lines are read as one. The riming form in stanza one. two and four is ababcdcd but stanza three is ababacac. The verse form chiefly has a regular rhyming strategy but the ‘flow’ is disrupted in stanzas one and four lines five and six. I am non certain if this was knowing. I believe the verse form can be interpreted in many different ways ; the overall feeling is the separation of two lovers. throughout the verse form there are legion mentions proposing mourning. loss and unfaithfulness. In the first Stanza the metaphor ‘Pale grew thy cheek and cold. colder thy buss ; ’ uses pale and cold in contrast with the rose-colored warm imagination of life. this could really good be an indicant of decease but could merely be an hyperbole of how he felt after the interruption up. On Line four the statement ‘To sever for years’ is equivocal as it suggests a drawn-out separation but can besides intend cut in two therefore could be related to line three ‘Half broken- hearted’ . another interesting point is that the Byron used the word old ages instead than infinity or everlastingly. possibly there was a hope of being reunited once more in the hereafter. ‘Sorrow’ symbolizes the heartache and bereavement he feels. non needfully for person who has passed off merely merely a loss. In stanza two ‘The dew of the forenoon. Sunk iciness on my brow’ the dew is the cold moisture. the image of rain could be an fable of cryings and meaning his wretchedness. ‘Thy vows are all broken. ’ implies his ‘lover’ was or is married or the promises she made to him were shattered. later Byron speaks of feeling ashamed when he hears his/her name. perchance because their relationship was illicit. The undermentioned stanza uses a powerful look ‘They name thee before me. A knell to mine ear ; A frisson comes o’er me’ a knell is the sound of a dejecting bell round easy at a funeral. his lover may hold died or Byron could once more be overstating his emotions. speech production as though his lover or ex lover has passed off. On line 20 Lord Byron asks ‘Why wert 1000 so beloved? ’ why were you so particular? Or why did I love you so much? . he is oppugning and resenting these feelings. the verse form so goes on to asseverate that cipher was cognizant of the relationship non even those that knew them both good. ‘Long. long shall I repent thee. excessively profoundly to state. ’ Byron is clearly stating that he bitterly regrets the state of affairs. wishing it had neer occurred possibly even experiencing guilty if his lover was married. Finally the 4th stanza confirms an matter of some kind ‘In secret we met- In silence I grieve. That thy bosom could bury. Thy spirit deceive’ . if his lover had died or simply returned to his/her spouse. so he would still sorrow in silence as the relationship was private. Byron feels betrayed and acrimonious about the relationship. the usage of the word ‘spirit’ once more gives the feeling of decease. ‘If I should run into thee. after long old ages. how should I recognize thee! With silence and tears’ . the last line of the verse form is a echo of the 2nd line ; giving an feeling of indecision. whilst the exclaiming grade puts the echoed line in a different context. when they meet once more it will be with silence and cryings nevertheless the silence will hold a different significance and the cryings will non be 1s of sorrow. It is about like each stanza represents the rhythm of Byron’s emotions. stanza one is the initial dissolution and the start of his sorrowing procedure. in stanza two Byron is still distressed and goes on to show his letdown and embarrassment. by stanza three he is ashamed of himself. oppugning the love and profoundly repenting the state of affairs eventually in stanza four he is acrimonious and fantasising of how he would ignore her/him if they were to of all time run into once more. Love’s last lesson’ is a soliloquy stand foring Landon’s defeat. My feeling is that the character has fallen for person who hasn’t returned her love or wasn’t taking the ‘relationship’ every bit earnestly as she was. The construction of the verse form is free poetry ; it has neither regular meters nor rime In lines one to eight Landon expresses her choler and defeat towards her ex love. who has evidently moved on and bury their relationship with easiness. she can non grok how it is her that’s been dismissed as she feels she was the perfect comrade. Landon uses words from a semantic field of faith ‘I who have worshipp’d thee. my God on earth’ is a strong statement but the metaphor emphasizes her absolute worship for him. ‘Your last bid. bury me. ‘she speaks approximately him as though he has control over her and she must obey him. ‘Will it non drop profoundly down within my inmost psyche? ’ oppugning herself for comfort the poet doesn’t think it’s possible to travel on. ‘Forget thee! – ay. forgetfulness will be a clemency to me’ she truly wishes she could hedge her emotions. it would discontinue her grief. The injury has taken control of her life to the extent of avoiding slumber in fright ; she relives the torment in her incubuss ‘a dream had made me unrecorded my sufferings again’ . The dreams she has are in fact worse than world. ‘Acting my misery. without the hope my foolish bosom still clings to. ’ the lone thing Landon can make now is ‘hope’ that there will be some patterned advance even though she herself thinks it’s extremely improbable. her hope is the merely positive thing she has left other than the grief and sorrow. she uses the simile of hope being like a drug that calms her hurting somewhat until the realization hits which makes it intolerable ‘double torture’ . Landon is isolated and passing her yearss entirely feelings nervous and uneasy. ‘when a breath sent the ruby to my cheek. like the ruddy gushing of a sudden lesion ; by all the careless expressions and the careless words which have to me been like the Scorpios stinging’ ruby and ruddy flushing to the cheek gives an imagination of shame. this gave me the feeling of calumny. Landon may hold a history that she isn’t proud of and that is what she really wants to bury. the manner she is being disregarded is what is aching more than anything as she said it was like a ‘scorpion stinging’ which is a simile for indefinable hurting. In this stanza Landon makes some powerful statements ; her felicity has been destroyed everlastingly. she’s deemed with ageless wretchedness. her feelings have been wasted. her wellness destroyed. her hopes have been crushed and her bosom stole.

How the USDA Has Addressed Discrimination

How the USDA Has Addressed Discrimination ​The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has made significant progress in addressing allegations of discrimination against minority and women farmers both in the farm loan programs it administers and in its workforce that have hounded it for over a decade, according to the Government Accountability Office (GAO). Background Since 1997, the USDA has been the target of major civil rights lawsuits brought by African-American, Native American, Hispanic, and women farmers. The suits generally accused the USDA of using discriminatory practices to illegally deny loans, delay loan application processing, underfund loan amounts and create unnecessary and burdensome roadblocks in the loan application process. These discriminatory practices were found to create unnecessary financial hardships for minority farmers.Two of the best-known civil rights lawsuits filed against the USDA Pigford v. Glickmanand Brewington v. Glickman - filed on behalf of African-American farmers, resulted in the largest civil rights settlements in history. To date, over $1 billion has been paid to over 16,000 farmers as a result of settlements in the Pigford v. Glickman and Brewington v. Glickman suits.Today, Hispanic and women farmers and ranchers who believe they were discriminated against by the USDA in making or servicing farm loans bet ween 1981 and 2000 can file claims for cash awards or debt relief on eligible farm loans by visiting the USDAs Farmersclaims.gov website. GAO Finds Progress Made In October 2008, the GAO made six recommendations for ways the USDA could improve its performance in resolving farmers discrimination claims and providing minority farmers with access to programs intended to help them succeed. In its report titled, USDAs Progress toward Implementing GAOs Civil Rights Recommendations, the GAO told Congress the USDA fully addressed three of its six recommendations from 2008, made significant progress toward addressing two, and made some progress toward addressing one. (See: Table 1, page 3, of the GAO report) Outreach Programs for Minority Farmers and Ranchers As early as 2002, the USDA committed to improving its support for minority farmers by releasing $98.2 million in grants to supplement its loan programs specifically for minority and small farmers and ranchers. Of the grants, then Sec. of Agriculture Ann Veneman said, We are committed to utilizing all resources available to help farm and ranch families, particularly minority and small producers, who need assistance. Besides the monetary awards, grants for minority farmers and extensive efforts to promote civil rights awareness and equality within the USDA itself, perhaps the most important changes arising from the settlements of the civil rights lawsuits have been the series of USDA outreach programs intended to serve minority and women farmers and ranchers. Some of these programs include: Office of the Pigford Case Monitor: The Office of the Monitor provides access to all court documents, including court orders and decisions related to the Pigford v. Glickman and Brewington v. Glickman lawsuits filed against the USDA on the behalf of African-American farmers and ranchers. The collection of documents provided on the Office of the Monitor website are intended to help persons with claims against the USDA arising from the lawsuits learn about the payments and other relief they are entitled to under the courts rulings.Minority and Socially Disadvantaged Farmers Assistance (MSDA): Operating under the USDAs Farm Service Agency, the Minority and Socially Disadvantaged Farmers Assistance was established specifically to assist minority and socially disadvantaged farmers and ranchers who apply for USDA farm loans. The MSDA also offers the USDA Minority Farm Register to all minority persons involved in farming or ranching. Participants in the Minority Farm Register are mailed re gular updates on the USDAs efforts to assist minority farmers.Women and Community Outreach Programs: Created in 2002, the Community Outreach and Assistance to Women, Limited Resource and Other Traditionally Under Served Farmers and Ranchers Program provides loans and grants to community colleges and other community based organizations for developing outreach projects to provide women and other under-served farmers and ranchers with the knowledge, skills, and tools necessary to make informed risk management decisions for their operations.Small Farms Program: Many of Americas small and family farms are owned by minorities. In the Pigford v. Glickman and Brewington v. Glickman lawsuits, the courts criticized the USDA as having an attitude of indifference toward the needs of minority small farmers and ranchers. The USDAs Small and Family Farm Program, administered by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, is an attempt to correct that.Project Forge: Another minority outreach ef fort of the USDAs National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Project Forge provides assistance and training to the primarily Hispanic and other minority farmers and ranchers in rural regions of South Texas. Operating out of the University of Texas-Pan American, Project Forge has been successful in improving the economic condition in the South Texas region through both its training programs and development of farmers markets.